On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:23:20 +0000 Markus Rothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Stephen Bennett wrote: | > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:36:18 +0000 | > Markus Rothe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > | > > Personaly I find it a little bit annoying to write changes twise. | > > One time in Changelog and one time in --commitmsg. How about | > > using the commitmsg for Changelog as default, but if a Changelog | > > entry already exists, then write nothing to Changelog. | > | > I'm sure you can manage to write a bash function to call echangelog | > and repoman commit with the same message. | | Sure, I can and the other mail shows that it is *realy* simple, but | why should every dev write his own "script", when this could be done | once for all?
Isn't this one of those things that's best done on a per-dev basis? It's so trivial there's no point shipping an app that does it -- reading the associated documentation would take longer than writing your own. Plus that way you can incorporate personalised clever things such as auto keyword messages for arch teams -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgp2tHY5rV26E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
