On Wednesday 10 August 2005 07:56 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Thursday 11 August 2005 00:39, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 11:24 am, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > On Wednesday 10 August 2005 22:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:10:39 -0400 Michael Cummings > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > | (not directed at dsd in particular, just the last one in my inbox > > > > | to reply :) That's great and all that its in features for the > > > > | installation, but what about packages with optional dependencies > > > > | based on doc and man? > > > > > > > > Join in the quest to get FEATURES added to the expand list! Bug > > > > #82513. > > > > > > How much do you like C code that has > > > #ifdef's for the compiler being used? It's the same thing. > > > > i'll take > > #ifdef __x86_64__ > > over > > use amd64 > > any day > > I was referring to compiler version. Portage FEATURES are not a guaranteed > part of an ebuild's "shell". Let me put it another way, should ebuilds > handle NOCOLOR as well?
no, but why should NOCOLOR affect how a package is built/installed ? the point here is that we dont really care whether it's FEATURES or USE or what, as long as we have the ability to control DEPEND/SRC_URI/behavior in an ebuild depending on whether the user wants tests/manpages/etc... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
