On Thursday 18 August 2005 09:13, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
> | I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That would
> make
> | it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making the QA tool help
> | enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that line of thinking,
> | please point it out in case I fall into the same trap in some other 
> | instance. 
> OK, here's your flaw. glep.gentoo.org says it's withdrawn.

Actually, it says "SW". Instead of searching up what SW meant, I decided to 
look at the GLEP itself where I figured the status would be written in 
English. It does have a status listed but apparently it is incorrect.

Jason Stubbs

Attachment: pgpKr6kzGieXL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to