On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 01:17:50PM +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > On 27/8/2005 10:42:25, Brian Harring ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hola all. > > > > Straight to the point, I'm proposing that the following files- > > arch.list > > categories > > use.desc > > use.local.desc > > package.mask > > updates > > > > be moved out of the profiles directory in the tree > > Not sure about package.mask. I thought that was part of the profile, > as different profiles might package.mask separately. I know I use it > in /etc/profile to postpone updates.
In fact the arch teams use it to mask packages that won't work on a
particular profile/arch. If package.mask is removed from the profiles
directory does it mean we won't be able to do that anymore ?
Cheers,
Ferdy
--
\\|// . . . o o o o O O ( Born to be )
o o ( FREE )
+--ooO--O--Ooo-----------------------------------------------+
| Fernando José Pereda GarcimartÃn - http://www.ferdyx.org |
| Gentoo Linux Developer - http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferdy |
| [ ferdy AT ferdyx DOT org ] && [ ferdy AT gentoo DOT org ] |
| 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
pgpplCN9gAkaM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
