On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 27 August 2005 03:38 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 15:11 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Saturday 27 August 2005 02:58 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > > Which reminds me .. anybody going to scream if I update elibtoolize() > > > > to be able to check if it was already run, and then bug the portage > > > > guys to also add it to econf() ? > > > > > > do what now ? > > > > Make econf handle elibtoolize the same way it does gnuconfig ... > > why ? this would help us embedded peeps with uclibctoolize, but other than > that ... maybe i just havent really sat down to figure out what elibtoolize > does ...
Because it applies the portage/relink/whatever patches to ltmain.sh without the need for real libtoolize and the pains that comes with it and a autoreconf (due to missing macro's, broken build system, etc). Note ... I really don`t think uclibctoolize and the other stuff that was added is really appropriate in libtool.eclass, as they touch config.guess, etc .. maybe it would have been better to update gnuconfig to try and apply the patch if in uclibc profile? -- Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
