On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 09:25 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 22:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 August 2005 10:15 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 21:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 30 August 2005 09:41 pm, Sven Köhler wrote: > > > > > > init.d scripts should have a pure env given to them ... which means, > > > > > > they should be run with `env -i` and have only whitelisted variables > > > > > > given to them (and everything that appears in /etc/conf.d/$service > > > > > > /etc/conf.d/rc and /etc/rc.conf) ... > > > > > > > > > > Now that may be too few variables. At least the variable LANG (or > > > > > whatever the system-admin may chose to set) could be seen as a > > > > > system-wide language-setting. It could be intentional, that at least > > > > > some variables are available to the started server-processes. > > > > > Especially a system-wide language-setting would be a good idea. > > > > > > > > that is the point of the whitelist idea ... we gather a 'full > > > > env' (source /etc/profile i guess) and rip out just the whitelisted > > > > variables to pass on to init scripts > > > > > > Although I agree, my personal opinion is that its going to be a major > > > PITA to maintain, and slow things down. > > > > with the first run, we cache the 'scrubbed' env, and then just use that in > > the > > future ? > > > > We both know when somebody finally notice that, they will bitch because > the environment is not updated :) Damn, did I just point that out ? 8) > > > > Also, not only runscript.sh > > > will have to be 'whitelisted', but also /sbin/rc, which will mean that > > > we now have to wrap two things. I guess a solution could have been to > > > use /sbin/runscript (the C thing) for both (should work fine > > > as /sbin/rc's interpreter as well), as that would buy some speed and > > > kill one bash fork, but the problem comes in when we start with a > > > vanilla environment that do not have /etc/profile sourced. > > > > mmm unification is good :) > > I did not argue .. was just wondering how much gain (tears?) it will > bring us :) >
Ok, the thing via /sbin/runscript won out - in baselayout-1.12.0_pre8. -- Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
