Philip Webb wrote:
Having gone over to Udev, I went to unmerge Devfs & got a big red warning. It appears that the 2005.1 profile gives Devfs as a virtual: is this an oversight or is there a reason behind it ? I would have assumed that Udev would now be the required device manager./usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1/2.4/virtuals : virtual/dev-manager sys-fs/devfsd
That is because udev doesn't work with a 2.4 kernel. -Steve -- [email protected] mailing list
