On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 19:39 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
> > | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was
> > | use-flag based RESTRICT...
> >
> > No, because then that would encourage even more people to abuse the
> > system and write incorrect ebuilds.
>
> IMHO this could be enforced by some policy ("don't use
> RESTRICT=interactive unless you really need it and some_group has given
> you the ok")...
No, it shouldn't. interactive ebuilds make remote updating very
time-consuming (you have to check wether it wants you to interact with i
or not yet) and are usually not needed - just ask the user to run ebuild
foo config (or whatever does thw job) manually.
--
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
