On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:44:17 -0600 Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That seems a bit unfair to me. There's a complete logging facility in > portage CVS for a version that's probably not going to be released, but > I believe that the logging stuff is being back-ported to the current > version of portage. (Moreover, I would argue that this issue was never > ignored, but it often wasn't at the top of the list for what our limited > portage devs should be working on: see > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11359#c83 .) It seems I was misinformed about this. My apologies to anyone working on this rather vital portage feature. -- Andrej "Ticho" Kacian <ticho at gentoo dot org> Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
