erm, and how exactly do you propose that the user who doesn't-read-the-site-because-it-has-no-useful-information-currently will learn about errata.g.o?
On 11/3/05, Nathan L. Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Brian Harring wrote: > > Not necessarily the website imo, some central store where it's pushed > > out to all of the locations though (which I suspect you're getting > > at). > > I forgot to clarify one point. I'm saying that http://errata.g.o/ should > be the *official* source where users go to find the info, not > neccessarity the place where the raw data is stored and pushed to other > places (although it certainly could be). > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFDarzS2QTTR4CNEQARAlB7AJsHfqCVL160KApWZU7iuqNtCb9SWwCcCtRR > D2e1H1U208kQQNzLDo9CpGk= > =kiyo > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
