-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Xavier Neys schrieb:
| Danny van Dyk wrote:
|
|> Xavier Neys schrieb:
|> | Discarding XML for the reasons some are using is like recommending
|> | key=value flat .ini files because windows used it in the 80s.
|> | They have to be parsed as well, and, as opposed to XML, you have to
|> | check for unknown keys, double keys, missing ones, then you need some
|> | grouping and you introduce [sections], which you have to check as well,
|> | no doubles, no missing ones, no illegal ones, then you need a deeper
|> | hierarchy and you use key=/path/to/another/file.ini...
|> He suggested using a RFC822 style Header. Please stick to the facts...

| Had you read that bit properly, you would have noticed I was quoting
| someone else.
| Had you read the post to the end, you would have realised I understand
| that and that I even support it.

I did read your post to the end. Still, adding things like the above
quoted INI-File talk has nothing to do with this discussions. Therefore
my demand to 'stick to the facts'.

As to the quoting: Please mark quotes as such. There maybe people who
can memorize this whole thread and recognize unmarked quotes... i can't...

Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDbAs9aVNL8NrtU6IRAmjKAKCNfYNw7SBbPttEK5ROy7PUgvWkGgCeM+ch
y/e6M4sYUp2/o3aZjBRREyI=
=pN17
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to