-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 09:23 -0500, Aaron Walker wrote:
> 
>>Continuing a subject I've brought up several times in the past...
>>
>>Are we any closer to having a profiles.desc that lists all valid profiles?
>>IIRC the current stable portage should be ok with it.  Are there any other
>>issues preventing this from becoming a reality?
> 
> 
> There should be no issues anymore.  I was planning on doing this myself
> at some point.  Are you wanting to do this, or should I?

Doesn't matter one way or the other to me :)  If you were planning on doing it
soon then go for it.  I probably won't have the time to do it myself until I
get done moving in a week or two.

I vaguely remember someone (might've even  been you) having all archs report a
list of valid profiles.  That'd be a good starting point.

Cheers
- --
How many weeks are there in a light year?

Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ BSD | commonbox | cron | cvs-utils | mips | netmon | shell-tools | vim ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDbXAxC3poscuANHARAqhDAJ9P20MkYu+8HlhS59k9BYTtHC+HOACgilSe
25436aidq0JMwoy/vRkJPKA=
=bnh4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to