Jakub Moc wrote: [Sat Nov 19 2005, 02:11:19AM CST] > Grrrmhhh, was it so much unclear? I mean: "stable on x86" definitely > belongs to changelogs, while "stable on x86, thanks Jim for opening a > keywording bug, Jack and Jim for testing and Joe for reminding me five > times to mark it finally stable when I forgot about it" does NOT.
I personally think: "stable on $arch, thanks to Jim and Jack (Bug #$bug)" satisfies the desired property of terseness while still suitably acknowledging those who have done the work. Moreover, there's been an informal policy of acknowledging helpful users in ChangeLogs for years now. > It's the responsibility of the developer who keyworded the thing anyway, ATs > are not allowed to keyword stuff and don't have RW CVS access, so what is the > purpose of tracking such stuff in changelogs and cluttering them? Use CVS > commit messages to track such things if you think you need it. I generally suggest that devs follow agriffis' lead and use a tool that generates the CVS commit message from the ChangeLog message. -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpezey9m0Gwt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
