On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:14:03PM +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:03:55PM +0100 or thereabouts, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > Isn't this an issue that also exists for the Gentoo developers in general? > > Not as much since we can track things like last cvs commit, last login to > toucan, etc. But it does exist to some extent. > > That does not, however, make it acceptable to further exacerbate the > problem. We're working towards improving the procedures and controls we > have in place today. We're not going to implement something that will move > us backwards.
I'll again point out that the glep doesn't actually mandate it, states it's the lowest common denominator that's acceptable. Stop pointing at one interpretation of it that sucks, when the glep _does_ leave it open to you how to implement it. It's a waste of people's time and bandwidth, and is a bit disenguous. ~harring
pgpopED2wW6i0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
