On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:49:20 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 24 November 2005 09:32, Marius Mauch wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:04:32 +0100 > > > > Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok I have three modifications that are pending to go into portage: > > > - The first simply enables creation of SHA1 checksums (and others > > > if implemented like with the second mod), if you want to try it > > > yourself see the attached patch. > > Looking through CVS, this was supported in at least > portage-2.0.51_rc10 right? This implies that the only versions that > will have problems are 2.0.50-r11 and under? If so, they've already > got the cascaded profile problem so breaking things a little more > won't hurt much. ;) > > Seriously though, those that can't handle the new format would have > to do what? Regenerate digests for sandbox and portage and then > emerge each of them with --oneshot? Am I missing anything else there? Nope, not missing anything. Thought I said it, compability isn't a reason to hold this up anymore, only asking if people want multi-hashes now at the expense of a bigger tree when Manifest2 comes along. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
