On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:05:53PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Afaicr, the infinity sign will be kept, but I know a huge discussion > > will be held on this. It's not important in this stage of the > > development though... > > And now we're told that it *was* important at that stage and it's too > late to change things? Riiiiiiight. >
I said that in that stage of the redesign development the logo discussion
shouldn't be held as it is part of the design "the infinity sign will be
kept" but that we leave it open for discussion if enough shoulders are put
under it ("huge discussion").
The primary concern at that stage of the development was to continue to
develop the design/XSL so that we have something workable when we offer the
design to the public... which is now.
Like I said before, I rather like the infinity sign. The trustees have had a
discussion on this part too. Their decision was that we need a "strong,
compelling case for not using it since it is something the community has
voted on".
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
--
Gentoo Foundation Trustee | http://foundation.gentoo.org
Gentoo Documentation Project Lead | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gdp
Gentoo Council Member
The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>>
pgphvGhgBwF9d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
