On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 19:12 +0100, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: > > Does this mean that we can get rid of the libstd++ dependency of gcc, > and move it to the binary packages that depends on gcc 3.3 . > I know this has been discussed before, but once it's stable I see no > reason to keep the dependency in the gcc ebuild, when it could be in the > binary packages. >
Well, right after the upgrade, there will still be tons of non-binary programs built against the old libstdc++, so no. Unless you want to force everyone to emerge -e world after the upgrade (which will make you very unpopular). Daniel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
