If everyone but infra was in favor of glep 41, are you saying it
should be approved?

</devils advocate>

On 12/12/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:43 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | A GLEP should list whom has been solicited and provide evidence that
> | each has given their explicit approval of the GLEP. A GLEP without
> | explicit approval of all teams involved cannot receive managerial
> | approval.
>
> So... If, hypothetically speaking, someone were to write a GLEP saying
> "move developer documentation into the QA group, restructure said
> documentation to this new format etc etc", and the QA group were in
> favour, and the developer community in general were in favour, and the
> council were in favour, and the people proposed by the GLEP to manage
> the new documentation were in favour, but the existing owners of the
> developer documentation were not, you're saying that it shouldn't be
> approved?
>
> --
> Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain)
> Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
> Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
>
>
>

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to