Whoops, sending to the list is a good idea ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:51:16 -0500 Subject: Re: Changes to date format of current GLEPs To: Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nope, but the changes further on. > Created: <date created on, in dd-mmm-yyyy format> > The Created header records the date that the GLEP was assigned a number, > while > Post-History is used to record the dates of when new versions of the > GLEP are > posted to gentoo-dev. Both headers should be in dd-mmm-yyyy format, e.g. > 14-Aug-2001. Should On 12/13/05, Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Dan, > > Dan Meltzer schrieb: > | Well, it would be changing Glep 1... which probably needs an > ammendatory GLEP > > I would apply these changes to glep-0001.txt: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] glep $ cvs diff glep-0001.txt > Index: glep-0001.txt > =================================================================== > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/glep/glep-0001.txt,v > retrieving revision 1.8 > diff -u -b -B -r1.8 glep-0001.txt > - --- glep-0001.txt 4 Apr 2004 23:05:35 -0000 1.8 > +++ glep-0001.txt 13 Dec 2005 20:45:37 -0000 > @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ > ~ Status: Active > ~ Type: Informational > ~ Content-Type: text/x-rst > - -Created: 31-May-2003 > - -Post-History: 1-Jun-2003, 2-Jul-2003 > +Created: 2003-05-31 > +Post-History: 2003-06-01, 2003-07-02 > > Do you _really_ think this make a GLEP necessary? > > Danny > - -- > Danny van Dyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFDnzUXaVNL8NrtU6IRAnruAJ4zXT5+gtyvKHi3BbD1EPvJYACCYwCgmG6z > FW28Kz5W3N1nFz3ZJuPOEh8= > =tVHu > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- [email protected] mailing list
