Olivier Crete wrote: > On Tue, 2005-13-12 at 21:09 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:53:45 -0500 Olivier Crete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> | Why not just modify GlEP 1 ? >> >> Going back and retroactively modifying standards is icky, and it >> *still* doesn't address the issue of documenting why the change was >> made. > > And why not just adding a changelog to the glep explaining the changes? > I really don't like to idea of having to read 8 gleps to find out how to > write a glep ... and calling it glep 1.a is a good idea.. or 1.1 >
agree, have to dig multiple places to get the history of a document is annoying. -- [email protected] mailing list
