Jason Stubbs wrote: [Tue Dec 13 2005, 05:44:39PM CST] > > Wouldn't it suffice for the GLEP to simply have a statement that it will > > query portage for a list of repositories, once there's a way to do that, > > but until then the default repo will be assumed? > > Modifications are required to portage anyway. Why postpone it until after > several readers are written and force all of them become broken?
Okay, so what is the portage team proposing to use for a repo query API? -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpKJpt3hG1A8.pgp
Description: PGP signature