Jason Stubbs wrote: [Tue Dec 13 2005, 05:44:39PM CST]
> > Wouldn't it suffice for the GLEP to simply have a statement that it will
> > query portage for a list of repositories, once there's a way to do that,
> > but until then the default repo will be assumed?
> 
> Modifications are required to portage anyway. Why postpone it until after 
> several readers are written and force all of them become broken?

Okay, so what is the portage team proposing to use for a repo query API?  

-g2boojum-
-- 
Grant Goodyear  
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

Attachment: pgpKJpt3hG1A8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to