On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:45 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:30:56AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +0000, Roy Marples wrote: > > > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > > > > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > > > > > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a > > > > > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real > > > > > features > > > > > for the 1.11.x branch ... > > > > > > > > Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the > > > > release? I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before > > > > 2006.0's release, and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12 > > > > isn't exactly the best plan for this. > > > > > > Got bug numbers? > > > > 57229 > > not an issue with baselayout, lvm code has been moved to the lvm ebuild
OK. > > 99682 > > that bug is still waiting for feedback from you releng peeps :P Ehh... what is needed from us? I don't see anything asking us for more information (and have commented as such on the bug). -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
