Mark Loeser wrote: > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >>Hello here, >> >>the virtual/ thingy broke the deptree again with virtual/libstdc++ (see Bug >>116253), essentially the same issue like with virtual/x11. These virtuals >>need to go straight stable if any of their RDEPEND atoms is stable for a >>particular arch. >> >>Betelgeuse is working on a repoman check for this issue, meanwhile, if there >>are more virtuals planned, please bear this in mind. :) > > > It makes no sense to make a check to verify what seems to be broken > behaviour. The virtuals should be like any other ebuild in the tree. >
True. It was just a quick suggestion on IRC. Maybe I will work on reverse dependencies instead, or not... Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
