Bret Towe wrote:

On 12/24/05, Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This isn't politics, but copyright infringement on top of a ridiculous license
(when you want to see it as one) we had a short discussion¹ about several
months ago.

im sorry i fail to see how copyright infringement or a ridiculous licence
matters when commiting a ebuild to portage just pick a licence if thats the
issue warn the user and leave it at that

Carsten


[1] http://tinyurl.com/9oxgc




I'm not a dev or anything, not a lawyer either, bit I'll try to explain it this way. You go buy a car at the dealership. Legal right? The car was stolen and sold to the dealership by the thief. It doesn't matter that the dealership or you didn't know the car was stolen. The crook is guilty of stealing the car, the dealer is guilty of receiving/selling stolen mechandise, you are guilty of buying/possesing it. All this when you nor the dealer knew it was stolen to begin with. It is legally up to you to make sure the vehicle is not stolen. If you don't, you pay the price.

So to apply to this situation. The program, according to the person that put it on sourceforge from what I read, knows the license is not legal but did it any. He even pretty much says so. So now unlike above, you know the license is illegal. Well, the Gentoo people know this too. They don't want to be the dealer above who could at the very least end up in court with a lawyer billing them hundreds of dollars a hour just to pass on something they know is illegal to begin with. You could be sitting in the next court room defending yourself as well. Just like the RIAA, you leave tracks and they know you have it. You get it for possesion like above.

Another way of looking at it is this. Let's say someone at Gentoo, like the people that write portage for example, find their code or program being distributed without their permission. If Gentoo does as you want, they couldn't really say much could they? Since by doing that Gentoo would be as bad as the guy that stole their code in portage. It's sort of like stealing something from a thief. Who is he going to report it too? He stole too. Of course, I say put them both in jail. Write to whoever is in charge of the program and tell them to get the license worked out so it is legal. I'm sure then the Gentoo people will jump on board and put it in portage for you.

Basically, what you are asking them to do is wrong. I'm not speaking for them but don't hold your breath hoping they will help you break the law OK.

My $.02 worth which is not legal advise either by the way.

Dale
:-)

Sticks foot in mouth so I will shut up.  LOL

--
To err is human, I'm most certainly human.

I have four rigs:

1:  Home built; Abit NF7 ver 2.0 w/ AMD 2500+ CPU, 1GB of ram and right now two 
80GB hard drives.
2:  Home built; Iwill KK266-R w/ AMD 1GHz CPU, 256MBs of ram and a 4GB drive.
3:  Home built; Gigabyte GA-71XE4 w/ 800MHz CPU, 128MBs of ram and a 2.5GB 
drive.
4:  Compaq Proliant 6000 Server w/ Quad 200MHz CPUs, 128MBs of ram and a 4.3GB 
SCSI drive.

All run Gentoo Linux, all run folding. #1 is my desktop, 2, 3, and 4 are set up as servers.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to