On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 21:41 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > > > >>Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc > >>or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have > >>ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this would > >>only happen with FEATURES="stricter". This is what I currently do in my > >>bashrc. Obviously when integreted to portage one can use helper > >>functions like hasq which are not available in bashrc. > >> > >> > > Well some people opposed this idea so what do everyone think about > making portage output stuff like this to a qa-warnings (or whatever) > file that developers can use? This would have the added benefit that > users would not normally see this stuff and report stuff so easily but > developers would still have easy access to it. Portage could even output > a header to this file saying not to file bug reports unless you know > what you are doing?
I see the point about not showing all the QA stuff to the 'regluar' user. Maybe only show this info on screen with --verbose set. As for the QA-warnings file, how does this differ from parsing the files in PORTLOG_DIR? Later Days, -Lares -- Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org lares/irc.freenode.net | Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net | Encrypted Mail Preferred Key fingerprint = 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628 C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
