Patrick Lauer wrote: > So - as GWN monkey - I'm offering my services as aggregator for project > updates.
I'd rather see the project managers/bosses/dedicated_members doing that themselves. Fine example might be GDP updates which work quite well, IMHO. > Maybe someone from the doc project wants to help to get this > information put on the website so that it's visible? I'm not sure about what permissions are required to post to the mainpage, but if the respective people are sane enough, they could get them, imho. > I suggest project updates every 6 months (which roughly is the same > timeframe as releases) Would those updates be mandatory or just recommended? > Any feedback appreciated :-) Well, as I said, we (the GDP) are already doing that. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to make such updates compulsory, but I'm sure we should at least recommend them. Let's make a deal - one lollipop/cookie for one status report, paid from the foundation funds, okay? :-) Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
