-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart Herbert wrote: | I agree that some cleaning is needed (and some of my packages are | desperate for it!), but I'm totally opposed to this idea. I think the | idea of shutting up shop for three months (presumably with a "closed | for refurbishment" sign on the door) would let down our users who rely | on us for regular package updates, and would be a massive PR disaster. | Cleaning is something that has to happen all the time; it needs to be | a natural and sustainable part of what we do every day.
I inferred "new packages" to be actual new packages and not updates to existing packages already in the tree. That's considerably less dramatic than what you're saying. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwH9yXVaO67S1rtsRAlhzAKDtYLmNH1988nv+t6AXs8EBXCGL2ACgunH5 YuqWmn3xVX2Z4548LhL7arA= =INQ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list