Alexandre Buisse wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 13:44:52 +0100, sanchan wrote: > > >>Hi all, I'm working on TinyOS related ebuilds (Bug #78908) and since >>actually there are 20 ebuilds in my overlay may be worth proposing a >>dev-tos category. >>It will take a few weeks in order to have all the ebuilds updated for the >>new release of tinyos, have them reviewed by peer an committed to the tree, >>but it's a lot easier to make a category early rather than moving stuff. > > > I don't know TinyOS, but I assume it is a "toy OS", like minix and many > others. > What about a dev-toyos category? It could be great to have some other > toy OS, including the one I have been working on (funk, see > http://home.gna.org/funk/), but also, if licences allow it, plan9, > minix3, coyotos, l4 and so on. > > I do not have ebuilds for any of them but could help make some if people > agree that it could be useful. > > Regards, > Alexandre Actually, TinyOS is a good operating system for small embedded design.. having the ebuilds somewhere in portage could be a good idea.. maybe dev-alternateos ? qnx could also go in there..
Best regards, Tomasz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
