неділя, 15. січень 2006 12:43, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) Ви написали: > If the 2005 does turn out to be a release date rather than the > standard name, then it makes sense as a release version; gnat-gpl-2005 > would be enough. Later releases can add a point revision if necessary; > if you do 2005.1 now, what happens if upstream release > gnat-gpl-2005.1.tgz? Good point. I kind of assumed that this just stands for the standard name, but it indeed may be used as a version number upstream. Well, I guess the only way to know is to pester them a bit more to see if they made up their mind about versioning.. Oh, well, here goes my hope to start commits today :).
> > Another possibility is gnat-gpl-3.4.5.2005, but I'm not sure that it's > worth it. Yea, 2005 looks not very much in line with the rest of it, although is a valid "release" number.. George -- [email protected] mailing list
