On Tuesday 31 January 2006 06:31, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Monday 30 January 2006 20:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > 1. Because for things like LINGUAS, there are arbitrarily many legal > > values, and documenting them all and keeping the list up to date would > > be extremely difficult. > > "More precisely, how should they be documented if not via use.desc?"
considering there's a ton more LINGUAS values than we have USE flags (just run `wc` on use.desc and lang.desc), bloating use.desc with LINGUAS settings benefits *noone* we have lang.desc, it is quite populated, what's wrong with having portage read that -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
