Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Yeah, unfortunately none of the people proposing the idea ever wrote a > glep or even filed a bug regarding this (AFAIK), also as the quoted > threads show there are a number of possible solutions for this.
It doesn't seem that too many people feel strongly in favor of it (judging by
responses so far), so why don't we just say that it is invalid until such a
time where someone can come up with real-life examples where this would prove
to be beneficial. Is this something that repoman could check for (should I
file a bug), or just something to keep my eye out for?
I don't see this as a groundbreaking change that requires a GLEP or anything,
especially since I eliminated most of the duplicates today, after talking
with the respective maintainers. There are probably only 3 or 4 left.
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/
http://www.halcy0n.com
pgp6bP1klamaJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
