On Thursday 02 March 2006 21:51, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:38:33 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | Then explain people that doing this is not the way.
>
> Have done, repeatedly, as have many others.
>
> | And is it really a qualityissue? In all cases? There must be cases
> | where the problem is package + arch + useflag specific, and this
> | solution "solves" it.
>
> This is most definitely a quality issue in cases where it is misused.
> See my reply to Grobian for why it's a huge problem. And yes, there are
> legit cases of using !arch? inside DEPEND, which is what makes it even
> harder to detect deliberate repoman circumvention.

I've read your explanation in the other reply. I agree with you that it is 
indeed an issue.

Paul

ps. The explanation was clear to me.

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

Attachment: pgpyjB4SoEQ9o.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to