On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:19:47 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attached is the final draft. No substantial changes since last time, > just wording cleanups and a few clarifications. You'll be able to see > it here in an hour or three (check the dates!): > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0042.html > > Or you can try to read the attached RST source, but no moaning that it > looks weird if you do. > > Unless there are any huge flaws found, I'd like this to be voted on by > the council -- looks like it'll have to wait until April's meeting to > fit in with the two weeks rule. Nothing major, just a few minor issues (I'll admit I'm late): "* Portage must extend portageq to implement a command which returns whether or not the profile used for a given repository ID matches a certain base path (e.g. portageq profile_used default-linux/sparc/sparc64/2004.3 gentoo-x86)." Wording here is a bit unclear, I assume it's supposed to mean wether or not the (any) used profile belongs the the given repoid and is (a subprofile of) the given profile name. Using "path" here is dangerous, e.g. portageq profile_used base gentoo-x86. As any substantial change results in a new news item should there be an optional "Obsoletes" header? Could be used to make sure people only see the most current version (without relying on rsync to wipe deleted files). Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. -- [email protected] mailing list
