On Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2026 18:02:09 MET Filip Kobierski wrote: > > Users are encouraged to migrate to another tool like > > app-admin/pass or vaultwarden. > > I think app-admin/keepass is a more natural choice here since > it supports .kbdx files unlike pass, and is stable, > unlike vaultwarden.
app-admin/pass-import can import your .kbdx or so I've heard. Guides exist. > > Stuck on QT5. Endangered by the QT5 purge. Needs porting to QT6. > > I have close to no GUI programming experience so I do not think > I will have the time to do the qt6 migration upstream. > I would prefer to keep using keepassxc even if that meant > maintaining it. Does it make sense for me to step up? A token maintainer will not stop this package from being treecleaned. Fixes to packaging can be made irrespective of you registering as maintainer, and upstream currently do not give you anything else to work with. As long as they don't deliver future prospects, or *you* come up with the Qt6 porting commit yourself, I don't think it makes sense. Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
