Hi Michał, The issue you described is real and widespread.
Maybe one could flag slop packages with a LICENSE variable that is not accepted by default? That would allow users to still have the final say in what can run on their Gentoo systems but would be aware that AI-SLOP license is suboptimal. Then I imagine the problem would be in marking packages as such... Also the name of the "LICENSE"; AI-SLOP seems in-line with Gentoo's approach, alas I in my opinion is unprofessional. Plain AI does not really sound discouraging. Naming is a secondary issue though. What do you think about that? -- Regards fkobi
publickey - [email protected] - 0x0C3B8028.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
