On Tuesday 04 April 2006 06:52, Mike Frysinger wrote: > sorry, those last two paragraphs are covered elsewhere between infra and > evrel ... so the document should be considered without those last two > paragraphs > -mike
This is what I'd like to see clarified. To me, only a decision of the Council may lead to such a "suspension", as it is the relevant _elected_ entity. And I hereby request to add a paragraph at least, stating exactly this. Also I do agree with foser and many others about the dubious wording. It can be stretched to any extent, if "needed". And I'm not that suspicious, given that Infra already acted once, without having any right to do so. Carsten
pgpgb0LD0E4qS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
