On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:06:24 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | ++ for Halcy0n, and adding from an ebuild maintainer some more, many | parts of the current tree are at a minimum understaffed, if we're | going to have to start dealing with bugs coming from users | experimenting with something else but portage, we'd be _really_ taken | over.
That's rather funny, when one considers the whole BSD profile structure and the zillions of ebuild changes that've been made for BSD. Be realistic here. The changes for Paludis are tiny compared to the changes that have been required for various Portage upgrades. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- [email protected] mailing list
