On Tue, 16 May 2006 16:15:49 +0100 Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If noone has any strong reasonable objections, I'd like to add a > Paludis profile to the tree. This would use Paludis as the default > provider for virtual/portage (which is a less than ideal name, but > that is another discussion entirely), and provide ebuild devs with a > place where they can try out some of our profile enhancements should > they want to. It is worth noting on the last point that most of these > are long-standing Portage feature requests, at least some of which are > planned for inclusion in Portage at some point in the future. This > would allow devs access to them earlier, as a sort of testbed. Why should this be handled differently than Gentoo/ALT projects? Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
