On Wednesday 17 May 2006 17:21, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:13:31 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > | At this point I don't see that paludis is ready for such thing. > > How would you know? > > | In any case I think that optimally a package manager does not require > | its own profile. > > Perhaps you should look at how much Portage stuff there is in the > profiles. The Portage-specific things are why Paludis needs its own > profile.
I couldn't find anything in the "default-linux/x86" profile. Could you perhaps point something out for me. I realise that there is a lot of *ebuild* specific stuff there. That has more to do with what an ebuild is than what portage does though. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgprkj5LHP2tt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
