Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 17 May 2006 17:11:04 +0200:
> Let's make clear why I put this in. Basically I am of the opinion that > until a decision is made to make (in this case) paludis the primary > package manager, all official packages should work with portage. Package > masked packages are not considered official. Wasn't it stated that the mechanism paludis uses to hide ebuilds that won't work in portage from portage is to mask them to it? IOW, this is already the way it is being handled. If masked packages aren't official, and ebuilds that require features only in paludis are masked as far as portage is concerned, then that checkbox can be checked off. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
