On Wed, 17 May 2006 21:32:47 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Yamin) wrote: | On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:30:10PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: | > On Wed, 17 May 2006 20:56:14 +0000 | > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Yamin) wrote: | > | > > Well, if you're going to have a package manager that delivers the | > > same result as Portage it must therefore work with Catalyst... | > | > Paludis can produce the same end result as Portage. The reason it | > won't work with catalyst is that the interface is different. | | ... so thus you claim it can produce binpkgs (I'm not bothered about | the interface, but the support to produce said binpkg must be there | and also to utilize said binpkg to install things)... and it can't.
No, we claim that it can install a system (very suckily and messily, right now, but in the future when we're claiming that it can install a system *nicely*, it won't be in the slightest bit inelegant). | Yes, getting this thread back on-topic would be nice. Then stop taking potshots. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- [email protected] mailing list
