On Friday 19 May 2006 09:33, Roy Marples wrote: > Maybe you haven't noticed, but baselayout is a virtual - which does make > things harder as the main "forks" (vserver and fbsd) sometimes break when > we add new things and they haven't synced up yet.
I have nothing against a virtual. I just don't think polluting the profile subtree with alternative package mananger stuff is good idea. > But that's OK as they're supported I guess. > > Or are you saying that spb, other devs and people outside of Gentoo who has > submitted SoC applications about Paludis (or what that qaludis?) are just > going to wack it into the tree and then say "we're not going to support > it"? > > Of course not! No, I'm saying it's not the Gentoo package manager. Work on it, make it a viable contender for replacing Portage, but as long it isn't, keep it in an overlay. Carsten
pgpAKM1VE6DjN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
