On Чтв, 2006-06-08 at 21:20 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > It's not a "normal" overlay as I see it. You've promoted it to be an > official overlay. The difference is huge in my opinion.
IMO such overlay should be official! Why not to keep all (partially) broken ebuilds in one place? This is the same story as with German gentoo forum that is outside gentoo.org and thus none of devs wanted to keep eyes there, so forum became much less useful. Another problem with BMG is that it is gnome oriented, as cleary stated on About page and thus I never thought that my, fex, www-apps could be there. > > As already mentioned at 1), it is an overlay. The devs on sunrise do > > keep an eye on it and all ebuilds do have to pass at least repoman and > > some basic QA checks (currently done when porting them from bugs.g.o) so > > that they don't do some rm -rf / thing. > > Will you also review the code each and every ebuild pull down over the > internet? And that is really exciting moment. :) The main difference between such overlay and wiki is that reading text never does `rm -rf /`. How can one stop such jokes? I think if this problem will be solved such overlay should be. Peter.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
