On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:07:34 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Monday 12 June 2006 22:58, Stephen Bennett wrote: | > I would like to think that this proposal addresses most of the | > concerns raised in the last thread -- it implies nothing about | > support for any other package manager, and introduces nothing that | > could cause problems for Portage users, while still allowing | > alternative package managers to use the tree without needing | > Portage installed. | This seems to be more acceptable. The implicit unstated dependencies | on Python are something that will also be interesting to find out | (especially for packages building Python modules automagically).
I had a look at this. I didn't find anything that actually relied upon python from system -- it seems that people are pretty good about specifying python deps explictly. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk -- [email protected] mailing list
