-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > Not really, tightvnc isn't on this list ... is there some reason you > can't use it instead?
tightvnc doesn't provide the vnc.so module for X. x11vnc can do the job, but it's unstable for me and quite sluggish... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEnEKm6q4f+IV6B/wRAnoHAJ9UpEwZSCIbvPNhm+/xGBwXh4WlPQCfeF8I mJQ/Yh4d0StyozdHu5tdCRw= =SQKz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] mailing list
