Please move this thread to the appropriate mailing list.. (ie not this list)
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 14:31 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > <snip> > > > > Yes, would be better, if it's included in the gpm release. > > > But: it should be possible to build/install it independently from > > > gpm, and also to build gpm against an already installed libgpm. > > > So actually two separate packages, maybe distributed in one tarball. > > > > considering gpm uses autotools, i really dont see why there needs > > to be all that many changes ... write it correctly and it'd be > > easy to fold into configure.ac/Makefile.am > > > > ./configure --disable-binaries > > That doesn't seem to be clean enough for me. I need the libgpm, > and only libgpm, built, and then gpm server built against this > (already installed) libgpm, found via pkg-config. I've got very > strict policies at this point. > > My further plan in short words: > > + further tests on libgpm > + split off the gpm server and rewrite to build against an already > installed libgpm (found via pkg-config) > + put both into some cumulative package, which can be build > just as the current gpm package. > > Meanwhile we also should try to get in the pkg-config stuff, > and let several parts to be switched off as you suggested, > optionally build the server against an installed libgpm, etc. > > > cu > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service > > phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ > fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cellphone: +49 174 7066481 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
