On Friday 07 July 2006 02:46, Mike Frysinger wrote: > this sort of closed mindedness isnt really encouraging ... Err I actually thought if icc in the first place and tried to inform myself. I'm not the kind of person (and you should know) who likes breaking unsupported stuff. I think it's reasonable to find a solution that works with ICC, and actually Harald already gave one later in the thread. It's just a matter of fact that we don't have anybody right now to follow what might and might not break this or that unsupported compiler. As soon as there is a single person ready to at least answer to questions about it, the situation changes.
I'm just saying that I wouldn't discard entirely a solution just because some unsupported software _might_ not work (note the conditional). I wouldn't discard a solution just because it _might_ not work on GNU/kFreeBSD; I would discard it if I _know for sure_ that it does not work on GNU/kFreeBSD (in which case, knowing it doesn't work, I would look for a working solution). -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgp3WfZaRwdgm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
