Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: > On Wednesday 12 July 2006 16:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I really would like to see back the upstream version, what do you think? > The reason for this was security I believe. xpdf code is embedded in lots > of other packages (see http://glsa.gentoo.org for some examples). By > linking to poppler this is fixed in one place.
Right you are, the reason is security. > > Though if someone is willing to maintain a vanilla xpdf ebuild I'd have no > complaints. Genstef? > I have no complaints either. If there is exg doing the security bumps and taking care of the upstream version I am supporting it. - Stefan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
