Ned Ludd wrote:
>> | Well it should.
>> | 
>> | package.keywords package.use package.mask etc.. 
>> |
>> | Where is the stability and consistency when we end up 
>> | forcing people to update /etc/portage files... 
>>
>> Erm... Portage updates these automatically.
> 
> as .cfg_** files. The end user still has to run an etc-update and 
> pray that it was not a file he/she had in masking.

Err, no? You don't need to run etc-update/dispatch-conf to get those
updated on package moves.



-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPG signature:
 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature   ;)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to