* Martin Schlemmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:

<snip>

> > build or unpack both nspr and nss and then look whats laying around
> > there. the nss sourcetree contains the nsprpub tree.
> > 
> 
> Yes, but we don't install it with the nss ebuild, as our build uses
> system nspr.  I am sure you could check with upstream, but they will
> probably say its intended as nss needs nspr if I remember correctly.

So the nspr subtree in nss is dead code (for gentoo) ?
Then we better should remove it - just to be sure ;-)

BTW: it seems both nspr and nss are not really standalone packages,
but instead snippets from CVS which requires much manual interaction
(which is done by the ebuild). IMHO it would be worth investing some
time into making both nspr and nss standalone packages with clean
pkg-config, etc. Although I dislike autotools for some reasons
(ie. crosscompiling is very ugly) we could use it until something
better is available (in fact I'm working on my build tool ...).
Something Xorg-modular ;-) Many distros would benefit from that.


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
        http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
        http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to